no doubt about it: censorship hath a devil to the nipple.
A naked girl looks at the viewer, turned half.
My eyes follow the clear and impertinent little curve until, in a completely unexpected in the light fades, or the steam of a bath illuminated by the sun.
curve that fades into infinity has something poetic, but certainly does not satisfy the viewer hungry, voyeur by nature.
Meets a lot more film censorship. Whom he may have to clear the chaste nipple Laura Chiatti from the as cast film poster of Roberto Faenza "The Case of Klara" .
Justification? is too sexy.
And to think that the nipple is the last bastion of female maternity.
focal point of the maternal role, and while the nature of erotic desire breast.
that belongs to our mother or a young & beautiful Italian actress, what's the difference?
Although it is not relevant, I am reminded of the case, but editing is not censorship, navel 'disappeared' from the picture a Playboy playmate, another center of gravity of motherhood and sexuality disappears, if only for a botched job of post-production, raising the ire of readers.
Increasingly, the body of 'public' woman, one overexposed by the media is manipulated and maimed, and almost always by men.
In the name of propriety, in the name of beauty.
And that embodies the highest value embodied by the woman - according to the Church - will disappear.
Let's be honest: even in the U.S., damn bigots, the nipple would be affected the same fate.
But there is a subtle difference between them and us: they are bigots, we baciapile.
